In my humble opinion, extending Short Service Commission from the earlier applicable initial terms of 5 years to the now applicable 10 years (extendable to 14) was a blunder and has had just the opposite result of what it was meant for, that is, attracting better talent.
There are many reasons why I say so :-
A. There is no seniority protection in the civil services for former SS officers anymore, which means that an ex-SSCO starts his/her civil career alongwith civil direct recruits 10 years younger to him/her and atleast two ranks junior to his/her former status in the Army.
B. If joining the corporate world, the ex-SS officer again starts at a point of the ladder where he/she competes with youngsters who already have had a head-start which the former SS officer missed out due to his/her joining the Army.
C. Ex-Servicemen benefits are entitled only on completion of terms of engagement which means that the said benefits which were earlier available after 5 years, are now available after serving for 10.
D. 10% of appointments at Assistant Commandant (Lieutenant equivalent) level in the CAPFs are reserved for SSCOs. There is no protection of seniority. Hence, ex-SSCOs of Major and Lt Col level are expected to join at Lieut level (GP 5400) in the CAPFs which makes the entire reservation redundant.
E. After completing 10 years of service, an SSCO is in his/her 30s and to expect him/her to then look around for a fruitful career, in my opinion, is otiose.
So what can be the solution ?
Well, the Govt has been outright discriminatory with SSCOs in this regard and it seems that even the Services HQ have not been able to see through this or else they would never have allowed the initial terms to be extended from 5 to 10 years.
Why discriminatory you may ask ?.
Because, on the civil side, in accordance with Rule 49 (2) (b) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, civil employees become eligible to earn pension after serving the govt for 10 years, whereas our SSCOs are released without a pension and are only granted a gratuity even after serving 14 years. After the 6th CPC, civil employees are now entitled to full pension after serving 10 years under the ibid rule (it was 33 years for full pension prior to 6th CPC). Of course the civil 10 year rule only applies to those who are released or retired after completing 10 years and not to voluntary retirees.
If the govt is so concerned about making SSC attractive, then why not have similar provisions for our SSCOs. This would not be a favour but only placing them at par with civil employees. Why place them at a disadvantage vis-à-vis civilians? Not only would this provide them with financial protection, but would also encourage them to become self-employed, self-sufficient and to clamour for better placements in the civil sector rather than opting for junior appointments on the govt side only of the purpose of financial protection or pension. But I’m sure the thought process of some of us would be – If we grant pension to SS officers, then why would they opt for Permanent Commission? Well, losing a dollar while looking for a dime.
18 comments:
Firstly, i would like to point out that the all short service commission officers were looked down upon by the so call permanent commission officers even if most of them were excellent professionals.
Secondly, the requirement of preparing for a second career was frowned upon by the senior lot as lack of commitment to service.
Thirdly, there was no guarantee that even exceptional officers would be granted PC even if they desired to be absorbed.
Fourthly, they were treated like passengers that had to be kept out of good appointments with no help whatsoever for post SSC placement. This placed tremendous stress on these officers to seek soft posting towards the end of the SSC tenure leading to further alienation from the mainstream.
Finally,it was the services and not the MOD that wanted a longer tenure of 10 years for 'extracting more' out of the SSC officers before their engagement ended.
Last but not the least, the corporate world was more than happy to grab this SSC product and they seem to be doing well enough to be deemed successful anyway.
Well said and I agree.
Thank you Maj Navdeep,
You have hit the nail, not on the head, but at its right place.
I presume the brightest brains could have decided that this is the best way to stop SSC commission. It wil be a pride to salute this bright head.
And lastly, the SSC officers can now proceed on its legal recourse and give enough publicity to present the government a "fait accompli" to get pension.
An excellent proposal
The fauji babus the so called at Pune didnt even knew that the SSCOs are Ex servicemen.Shame on these illetrate ,ignorant and corrupt Babus the so called Army officers!!!
The picture painted about the career prospect of SS officers may not be that bad as presumed. There are cases when right opportunity did not materialise to persons to strike at right time. There may be late starters in the run but it is a known fact that the central government which is basically controlled and managed by the so called steel frame do not want to share the pie. It is well thought out plan to belittle the People in uniform in every aspect whenever the chances are available.When the country needed young men to die for the country during 1962 operations and subsequently, EC officers were commissioned. Due to the late entry some of them were accomodated in civil services on release. In the beginning perhaps they were given seniority of Army service but the same steel frame objected tooth and nail and the result is before us.Please consider the officers cadre as one irrespective of the entry other wise we shall be fallling like the house of cards. Untill and unless the organisation do not stand to project the legitimate demands we sahll not be in a position to get due justice.It is apparent that the corridors of power do not really care about the sentiments and value of the people in uniform. They do only lip service when they are forced and compelled to do so.It is the bounden duty of the Chairman of the Chiefs Committee to get the rightful dues extended to the Armed forces. The matter is not all that simple when we fight indivisual battle like the issue of date of birth.
Lt Col BS Chaudhary
SSC is nothing but exploitation of the youth. pension regulations provided for reduced pension starting from 10 yrs service. arbitrariness of babus start from here after. PC officer paid reduced pension if permitted to retire after 10 years. a jawan if becomes a SSCO is entitled to pension on release after 12 years service. a late entrant officer isgiven pension after 15 yrs. but for all others its told 20 years, but they are unable to show where its written that pension not ADMISSIBLE for less than 20 yrs service. fraudelent ommission and violation of the regulations. if they say min 20 yrs required for pension then why they grant pension for less than 20 yrs by applying same regulations. again violation of statutory regulations. only one of the two can be true. but what can one do if the fauji babus in service HQs in Delhi( who should be taking care of faujis ESM), do not want to read/apply the regulations as written and applies equally to all officers without exception or discretion. leave aside giving pension or ECHS the fauji doctors(DGAFMS) are trying to deny the medicare presently entitled/provided to non pensioner ESM including SSCOs and have gone to the court. an officer becomes begger if released without pension as he stands with beggers in line for medicare in a govt. hospital.
The point about the lack of engagement by armed forces HQs regarding the issue is the most relevant of all. Actually, all such issues stem from the general orientation of our military HRD reasoning to operate from a position of "denying" respect or entitlements to the cadre, whether these be SSC or PC Officers. This mindset often asks itself the question, "Why should so and so enjoy parity/APC/Entitled Benefits? How will the higher echelons derive their authority without their power to deny the lower rungs these things?"
@Anonymous very well said
None of the Sr officers have given a commets here.Since it does not matter to them they are silent .......
Before we look outwards for anything , we need to introspect , Is our own organisation is giving SS officers their due
Navdeep,
At last a step in right direction from you. ssc are second to none .
many may have not given there option for permanent commission, not all ssc officers want pc. As you said it yes an ssc officer is at disadvantages position,as he as to start afresh after he leaves . It is the creation of our own brother officers. MOD should , have contested and a made party itself in SUPREME COURT , THEN SITUATION WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT.Navdeep you are a lawayer can you browse APEX COURT JUDGEMENT ON THIS ISSUE , please take up the issue with mod to file a review petition.
ssc officers are not entitled for pension, and echs also. SERVICES wants the profile of officers should be young, but does not want to extend benefits to ssc officers.
Mod has to take necessary corrective steps to set right the anomaly.
a ready reckoner on iaf website especially for pre 2006 pensioners.
may be of some help.
http://www.indianairforce.nic.in/dppr/download/CHECK%20YOUR%20PENSION.pdf
regards
...Further in addition
http://www.gconnect.in/6cpc-matters/principal-bench-of-cats-judgement-in-favour-of-pre-2006-pensioners.html
Giving medicare under ECHS only to pensioners is blatantly arbitrary and discriminatory. Because the condition/word pension has been removed from the regulations under which medicare is provided to ESM(pensioner-nonpensioner as one class )since 1996. Till date that regulation is inforce. Therefore again without authority of law/regulation, giving ECHS to only pensioner ESM is arbitrary and discriminatory and fraud. One can not create a class with in a class (ESM). This has been done by AGs branch ( our own fauji babus). This fraudalent action/omission/commission is punishable under army act.
Dear Maj Navdeep,
On this issue of MH facilities for ECOs/SSCOs, I fail to understand why govt and AMC are fighting it through SLPs.
Last ECO batch to be released was sometime around 1972 (about 40 years back). All these ECOs will be more than 72 years of age. I don't think more than 1500 ECOs would be alive.
Similarly considering the average intake of 250 SSC officers every year and around 50% of officers being absorbed in permanent commission, total SSC Officers released in the last 40 years would be around 5000.
If we deduct another 25% of SSCOs joining govt/PSUs where CGHS and other facilities exist,SSCOs interested for MH or ECHS would be around 4000.
And considering the percentage of ECOs/SSCOs who will actually fall sick and go to MH for treatment will be negligible. If AMC claims of looking after lakhs of exservicemen, is it a big extra burden on them?
At one end we crib that there is shortage of officers in the armed forces and at other end this
treatment will only result in negative publicity. It is not in the interest of either the army, MOD or in national interest to deny and contest the MH and ECHS facilities for ECOs/SSCOs.
Regards
Your observation is absolutely correct, Maj. Navdeep. We are mostly attracting mediocre peole into SS these days.
Well, this is what exactly happens with the PBOR too. They are made again to stand at the FAR END OF THE QUEUE when it comes to a job in the Civil.. any comments?
Bluemist
Dear Sir / Madam,
The authorities must urgently review the pathetic condition of hapless SSC officers. The cadre of SSC is akin to slavery reminiscent of draconian era. Now we can't even blame it on colonial rules as SSC cadre is a class of "slaves" in the worlds largest democracy. The secret policy of "Use & Throw" needs humanitarian revision. SSC offrs are left to square one after extracting 14 years of their prime time. No god-father, no ones baby. No pension, no ECHS facility. Same charter of duty & same exposure to risk factors. By the time a SSC offr quits army, his counterparts have not even made up their minds on what to be done in life. These brave men who joined the elite service needs recognition of their 14 years grueling service to nation. The country should atleast provide them with pro-rata post release facilities as applicable to civilians of central govt after completion of only 10 years of service. The slogan: Do You Have It In You ??? would be better relished by brave SSC cadre as they joined the Army because they really have it in them!!!! No malice intended to any one. Just hope that this piece is read in the correct perspective and something good happens for the SSC offrs. Jai Hind.
Maj Navdeep
Is it fruitful to file a case, against the issue of granting pension to ssc officers getting released after completion of 10 years of service in comparison to the provision for pension in civil
thanks
-Alpha Oscar
Post a Comment