Feel free to contribute on burning issues concerning the armed forces. Contributions would be acknowledged - Use the 'Comments' tab or email navdeepsingh.india[at]gmail.com. No operational/business/commercial matters to be discussed please. Legal advice/litigation related issues would strictly NOT be published or discussed or entertained. Information on this blog is opinion based and is neither official nor in the form of an advice. This is a pro bono online journal in public service related to issues, policies and benefits, and the idea behind it is to educate and not to create controversy or to incite. Be soft in your language, respect Copyrights.

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Forwarded as Received-II: Misplaced angst

This is related to my post published on 26 September 2015 titled “Forwarded as Received”.

We are living in a free society, thankfully, and a democracy where freedom of expression is respected and also expected.

There may be differences of opinion on how things are taking shape in the military community, but then one must understand that various views can co-exist and differences of opinion should not be so shrill so as to override the right of a person to disagree or to have a different point of view. The email wars present a different picture though.

But what must be avoided is rumour-mongering to score points or even to prove a point.

An electronic message is now doing the rounds that Generals of the Army have been granted Non-Functional Upgradation (NFU) through a recent Government order, which has been refused to others. The message is supported by a copy of a communication which lists out 9 Lieutenant Generals of the Army who have been granted a higher grade based on the same.

This is totally incorrect and presents a skewed picture of the situation. While arguably there may have been instances in the past wherein the interests of juniors were not appreciated in proper light by the seniors, this is not one of them.

The 6th Central Pay Commission had recommended that Corps Commanders who were eligible but unable to pick up the Army Commander’s appointment (C-in-C) due to fortuitous lack of residual service of 2 years, should be granted the grade of the Army Commander on a non-functional basis. This was accepted by the Government and the orders were issued and notified vide Para 4 (a) (ii) of SAI 2/S/2008 way back on 11 Oct 2008.

The grant of non-functional grade/scale has hence been in force since the 6th Central Pay Commission vide orders issued in October 2008 and has no relationship with NFU granted to civilians and is not something that has been initiated by ‘Generals’. Obviously, it is applicable to the Air Force and Navy too.

It would be in the fitness of things if the focus remains on the right issues rather than getting into unwieldy subjects which are not based on the foundation of truth.

Let us be more responsible, and on a related subject, let us also learn to live with difference of opinion rather than casting aspersions on those who have a different viewpoint on the scheme of things during these churning times. Anyone who has a varied take today is declared as having joined the 'other side'. Is this the correct approach? 


Anonymous said...

"For whoever has, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance. But whoever does not have, from him shall be taken away even that which he has" (Matthew 13:12)

Anonymous said...

Is it not an indication of growing distrust and detestation of top brass by the juniors?

parry said...

For whoever has, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whoever has not, from him shall be taken away even that he has.

Anonymous said...


why no NFFU for normal officers ?

else throw these non empanelled officers compulsorily .. whats the point of keeping them bonded and denying them ?

whats the reason , its not there for fauj ? there is so much misinformation.. if you can clear the air..

Unknown said...

You rightly said that the defence services try to show that they are different or superior than the civil services. This is especially so with the persons in the Officers category. If that was so, why did the officers demand 'free ration' like the jawans since 1983? Now that is also withdrawn in the 7th Pay Commission!

The defence service Officers may be experts in holding the gun in a battle field but they do not know how to hold the pen on the files of the Government. Further military officers are mostly exposed to giving or taking salutes, accompanied by big "Yes Sir" They do not how to manage dissent. The IAS Officer knows how to say "Yes. Minister" and still not carry out the order because he knows the next political boss may ask him to reverse the earlier decision.

Along with the etiquettes in which our defence service officers are well versed, let us train them how to manage dissent.

Wing Commander S. A. Draviam (Commissioned in 1965 and Retired since 1986)
B.Com, LLB, FCS, MBA, PhD.
Held positions like Secretary International Airports Authority of India (on deputation), Secretary Inland Waterways Authority of India, Secretary and Legal Advisor, CMC Limited ( a PSU then) and Executive Director, Ludhiana Stock Exchange.
Visiting Professor of Law and Management for 20 years from 1994 to 2014.