Feel free to contribute on burning issues concerning the armed forces. Contributions would be acknowledged - Use the 'Comments' tab or email navdeepsingh.india[at]gmail.com. No operational/business/commercial matters to be discussed please. Legal advice/litigation related issues would strictly NOT be published or discussed or entertained. Information on this blog is opinion based and is neither official nor in the form of an advice. This is a pro bono online journal in public service related to issues, policies and benefits, and the idea behind it is to educate and not to create controversy or to incite. Be soft in your language, respect Copyrights.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Kashmir, from an Armchair!

My opinion piece on the commentary on military strategy in Kashmir by armchair and keyboard warriors, published by ABP News:

Kashmir, from an Armchair!

Major Navdeep Singh

Troopers of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) went down for us recently in Pampore, Kashmir. Before the nation could absorb the shock or their families could come to terms to the tragedy, there was whole lot of noise on the incident in the media and the social media, amusingly mostly from those who know nothing about military strategy, battle or insurgency except the in-depth knowledge gained through video games and who dished out ideas on how terrorism should be dealt with by our forces and how a befitting reply was called for. Then there was a small group of military veterans who lamented as to why the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) could never professionally compare with the regular Army.

To my limited understanding, three things starkly stood out from this most unfortunate incident and the debate it generated. Firstly, that the narrative is increasingly being taken over by armchair warriors who have no inkling about what they’re talking about. Secondly, our troopers from the CRPF and other CAPFs and even their capabilities as individuals, unfortunately, are constantly being shown in bad light. Thirdly, the turf war between agencies, real or perceived, is not in the interest of the country and too much over-correction and micromanagement may also kill the military initiative of troops operating in trying circumstances.  

Let me attempt to explain these three aspects in detail.

War, more specifically counter-insurgency, is not mathematical. There is no textbook solution in military strategy. While broader principles are to be kept in mind, the unpredictable nature of such warfare makes it impossible to foresee every single step of a brainwashed enemy who is out to die and who has no value for life- his own, his peers’, innocent civilians’ or soldiers’. Troops operate in a hazy zone and it would be nice if people with no inkling of the actual on-ground situation of that moment, including this author, keep their mouths zipped and let experts in that area handle it. Contrary to popular propaganda, growing incidents of such attacks do not reflect the failure of our security establishment but simply the frustration of our enemies, and there should be no doubt in anybody’s mind that the current leadership in the area is not just capable, but also the best. Also coming back to those who comment from afar, as I always say, military operations sound exciting only for those who watch them on TV thinking as if war is some kind of fireworks display- ask those who suffer the legacy of war and their families.

Whenever personnel of CAPFs go down for our national cause, immediate comparisons are made with the defence services wherein it is stated how poor they are professionally when compared to the Army. And this is stated in such a manner as if it’s the fault of the individual trooper. Yes there may be deficiency in training, yes there could be lack of professionalism and equipment, but the same is not the fault of the person who is wearing the khaki uniform and performing his or her role to the best of ability. The fault may lie in long standing policies which have resulted in lack of attention to issues related to the CAPFs. In case of CRPF, it has assumed the role of Chalte Raho Pyare Force wherein there is no cohesion and small sections of personnel keep moving here and there on varied and multiple duties without any kind of regimentation, but for this the individuals wearing the uniform cannot be blamed and it is the policies which would need to be reviewed, and which review, we hear, is in the offing in the very near future. Let us realize, our men and women of CAPFs do not lack in bravery and they emerge from the same populace as personnel of our military, and sacrifice of every soldier deserves the same respect, irrespective of the colour of the uniform. Though not exactly mutually exclusive, should our nation be concentrating more on the missiles that we’re never going to use or the basic equipment of the soldier on ground, is what we should introspect about.

Coming to the last of the three points that I would like to touch, incidents of turf wars between organisations, as also partly initially seen in this occurrence wherein there was a controversy as to which force killed the militants, are growing by the day. Of course though since times immemorial we have been told that success has many fathers while failure is an orphan, this tendency of glorification should not extend to absurd extremes where national interest is forsaken for narrow pomposity and fleeting fame. The magnanimity of the Army’s Northern Command in officially clarifying that such operations are conducted by way of synergy between various forces hence came as a much required development. Even the tendency of micromanaging the reaction of troops when they are faced with the enemy can at times kill the initiative of soldiers in Catch-22 situations and that is where the Prime Minister’s statement about freedom of operation for our troops also comes as a welcome announcement.

While a space for free, candid and open discussion is the very foundation of democracy, we must display due sensitivity towards those whom we lose in such unfortunate incidents. Before blaming them individually or commenting upon the merits or demerits of various strategies in complex military situations, let us close our eyes and think of the families the tears on whose faces have not yet gone dry.

Major Navdeep Singh is a practicing Advocate at the Punjab & Haryana High Court. He was the founding President of the Armed Forces Tribunal Bar Association at Chandigarh. He is a Member of the International Society for Military Law and the Law of War at Brussels. 


karunakaran a ex havildar said...

Dear sirs,

In our household affairs our parents are having different type of responsibility to groom the children, we should not overestimate or underestimate the rearing capability of either mother or father both are for the well being their children, para military forces and military though they have their own respective responsibility no one is superior or inferior to each other, they are also our dividend brothers they deserve for better pay and honor as we claim

alok asthana said...

Your statement ' ---- failure of our security establishment but simply the frustration of our enemies' seems wrong to me. It IS success for them ,not frustration. If we don't even accept that our SOPs, and possibly intelligence failed here, we'll not get down to improving them. Third rate trained/equipped militants repeatedly succeeding not only against CRPF, but also regular army is a very bad sign. I wonder how troops are reacting to a feeling that even their Chief could not prevent a bunker from being demolished in downtown, despite his best attempts. Where is this political establishment, led by the mast macho PM ever, leading the forces? Suggestions that troops should be wearing bullet proof jackets inside a protected bus shows the country in a very bad situation.

Bharat said...

Thank you, Maj Navdeep. As always, your sane voice puts things in the correct perspective. We, the retired Fauji fraternity should utilize our time constructively, to aid in progress of the nation, rather than indulge in mud-slinging. We should look at how the organisational culture of the Armed Forces and CAPFs can be improved, rather than cry hoarse about the existing lacunae.

hema anand said...

Dear Major,
I was witness to a panel discussion on television where the fissures and bared fangs /claws were visible in national glare. The country deserves better than blamegaming, mudslinging and squabbling on primetime TV. The political leadership also needs to pragmatically lead beyond intra-ministerial interests and direct the national effort of all uniformed services towards more cohesive mechanisms and processes wherein greater synergy and not rivalry are encouraged and enforced. But that is guess is asking for too much in a nation where the muddled waters of IAS/ IFS/Gp A/Fauji turf wars and dulled sensibilities drive operations while perks and privileges are sought by proximity and not inherent capability.
Satyamev Jayate

laxman said...

It is a very well written piece by Maj Navdeep/. Unfortunately there are some grey areas such as lack of coordination between the army and the CPMF operating in insurgency areas ,sharing of int, quality of int one gets. In fact in such areas there are professional int gathering sources who thrive by squeezing big amounts from the different int seekers. Information is provided by one source to many seekers and by the time it gets to the collation center from different agencies it gives the impression of a hard int.At time the same info provider may be a double agent. As regards to the troops either from the CAPF or the Army are concerned they are the sufferer. Secondly when some thing goes wrong no one is your. Every one will find faults without knowing the details. Thats is the pity.

pm65 said...

Your observations are quite incisive and true. There should never be an attempt to compare Army with CAPFs who have different roles to play based on their mandate,training,ethos,equipment and most importantly quality of leadership.The only issue in Pampore lke incidents is the apparent lack of effective leadership bu CAPF DIG and above level officers,who are mostly are on deputation with the force with little or nil tactical sense, training and mental make up. Their inability to motivate troops on ground by example and by solving other operational ,administrative complex coordination issues,often leads to standard laid down SOPs not followed leading to avoidable incident.
Definatly their officer cadre are shy of leading from the front which could be due to various reasons including lack of self confidence or lack of training or both.