tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post632343621956273793..comments2024-02-08T22:01:40.101+05:30Comments on Indian Military : Service Benefits and Issues: Some updates: (1) 33 years rule, and, (2) An interview link Navdeep / Maj Navdeep Singhhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11481215977936848477noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-30961706497670461552016-07-16T18:13:21.921+05:302016-07-16T18:13:21.921+05:30Major Navdeep Singh, Would you please confirm if t...Major Navdeep Singh, Would you please confirm if the time taken to issue the notification in this case is justified and still patience by ESMs is the need of hour -- not that there is any accountability of any Babus, in any case. Thanks.....Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17625481885833185836noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-74276942476335493652016-07-02T14:59:00.731+05:302016-07-02T14:59:00.731+05:30In what ever table the lookup for pension amount, ...In what ever table the lookup for pension amount, instead-of for a given qualifying service length the lookup should be for the largest qualifying service i.e. 33 years. I wonder what complications are there as to delay release of circulars, in fact such work of preparing circular should be done at the same time as the matters were in court, only just in anticipation that justice would prevail.<br />This would not cause delays but give the arrears to the pensioners rather than their "Life time arrears" nominee. My This comment is restricted to the commissioned officers case.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-47037750608628701822016-06-08T16:31:26.942+05:302016-06-08T16:31:26.942+05:30Thanks for the update!!Thanks for the update!!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12753616977955314860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-86025687519060550532016-06-07T19:24:27.453+05:302016-06-07T19:24:27.453+05:30Sir,
I really not understood why delay and claimin...Sir,<br />I really not understood why delay and claiming it is as complicated. The delinking of 33 years orders should have been as simple as issuing a DA order. How can it be notional maximum for JCOs and ORs. this order for removal of linking of 33 years from Circular 547 and 548 nothing more nothing less. It is a modification of Annexure III of GOI letter dated 11 November 2008. If any one says the delay is owing to prepration of tables/calculations etc that means some manuplation is on going at Babu's levelAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02206472979770028306noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-5765235056830552622016-06-07T13:04:05.805+05:302016-06-07T13:04:05.805+05:30Sir, it is not that complicated either. the remova...Sir, it is not that complicated either. the removal of the 33 years’ condition for grant of full pension requires only deletion of para (iv) of PCDA Circular number 471 dated 30-09-2011.<br /><br />Thanks PBORnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-59735437383985162642016-06-06T21:42:39.742+05:302016-06-06T21:42:39.742+05:30Thanks for the update Maj Navdeep.Thanks for the update Maj Navdeep.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12753616977955314860noreply@blogger.com