tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post6118945791600007897..comments2024-02-08T22:01:40.101+05:30Comments on Indian Military : Service Benefits and Issues: Rank Pay forms a part of basic pay, release arrears to affected officers : Supreme Court, today, 04 September 2012Navdeep / Maj Navdeep Singhhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11481215977936848477noreply@blogger.comBlogger126125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-32925857563055325172016-08-05T00:14:49.831+05:302016-08-05T00:14:49.831+05:30Request clarification on the applicability of rank...Request clarification on the applicability of rank pay anomaly for offrs promoted to Capt after 01 Jan 1986.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-11711947677441472272013-09-09T16:55:40.518+05:302013-09-09T16:55:40.518+05:30Respected Sir,
I would like say that My Officer C...Respected Sir,<br /><br />I would like say that My Officer Commanding ordered to me that take the charge of weapon which is alloted to you and sign to the Weapon allotment Register. I requestly asked to my OC that Am I authorised to take the charge of weapon? He refused to say and shout and angry over me. After then you are not take the charge, I will fill Form 10 and send to Mental Ward.<br /><br />Because I am a Non-Regular person of APS. I have come from Department of Posts as on deputation to APS and MOD is saying that Non Regular person of APS is counted as Civilian and they are not authorised Military Service Pay .<br /><br />In APS 75% of Non-Regular person are working in APS (They are not Getting Military Service Pay and Civil pay band). Remaing persons of 25 % are Regular Army Person (They are getting Military Service Pay and Army Pay Band). APS are totally authorised 25 % of weapons. I would like to Know that actually who are authorised to take the weapons on charge. <br /><br />I have said my natural story. Plese advice to me for Rights and information.<br /><br />Thanking You Sir<br />Yours faithfully<br />XXXX<br />V MaharajanV MAHARAJANnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-29888913426351339732013-09-06T01:24:52.702+05:302013-09-06T01:24:52.702+05:30Congrats and Kudos to RDOA and Maj Navdeep.Its a G...Congrats and Kudos to RDOA and Maj Navdeep.Its a Great day due to this good news and a Definite reason to celeberate.<br />HOWEVER, IT IS LEARNT THAT DUE TO THE NEGATIVE APPROACH OF THE BABUS, THE EARLIER VERDICT IS BEING GIVEN A TWISTED AND DISTORTED INTERPRETATION. AS A RESULT, ONLY THOSE OFFICERS WHO WERE IN SERVICE AS ON 01 JAN 1986 AND DRAWING RANK PAY WILL BE PAID THESE BENEFITS. ALL TO NOTE.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-61010466306752839372013-01-17T22:28:15.186+05:302013-01-17T22:28:15.186+05:30Dear Sir,
It is a wonderful article. However I ha...Dear Sir, <br />It is a wonderful article. However I have some doubts. I interacted with with the CDA(O), Pune yesterday and they said that the arrears are only applicable to offrs who were in service on 01 jan 1986. Probably someone will have to fight a case to get the rank pay arrears for all offrs commissioned before implementation of sixth pay commission. <br /> vijay singhnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-3390238088236916402012-10-26T18:12:42.434+05:302012-10-26T18:12:42.434+05:30Col Raju brought out very relevant point to our no...Col Raju brought out very relevant point to our notice.therefore all those corrections and re-fixations on 1.1.96 &1.1.06 are also due as corollary of the supreme court judgement.<br />Now -implementation --IT IS FOR ARMED FORCES TO GET THESE IMPLEMENTED.<br />MILLION DOLLAR ???????????.IF ARMED FORCES CANNOT GET THE SUPREME COURT ORDER IMPLEMENTED, HOW CAN ANY BODY HELP THEM?????<br />INFERENCE-GET GOING AND GET IT.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-7390410095722130552012-10-13T21:32:53.345+05:302012-10-13T21:32:53.345+05:30Dear friends,
there is a lot of confusion abo...Dear friends,<br /> there is a lot of confusion about the applicability of the H'ble SC ruling. What I understand is that all officers commissioned after 01 Jan 86, should be eligible to get the arrears as they all got their pay with the rank pay part deducted (as fixed by the IVth and Vth CPCs. <br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-27568385244266735762012-10-08T09:03:58.419+05:302012-10-08T09:03:58.419+05:30It is a delightful experience to see the effort ma...It is a delightful experience to see the effort made by the Veterans including Maj AK Dhanapalan,Col BK Sharma, May Navdeep Singh and others. Kudos, best wishes and regards to them all.<br /><br />During Service, I felt whatever the Govt/Pay Commissions have done is gospel truth, and whatever the CDA(O) has done is bsolutely right!! What a painful breach of trust. <br /><br />The trust needs to be built up.<br /><br />Best wishesDr Vachaspati Mishrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14088512616402516830noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-23453435563214200502012-10-02T22:59:40.514+05:302012-10-02T22:59:40.514+05:30@ Anon 01 Oct and Col Raju...
While your interpr...@ Anon 01 Oct and Col Raju...<br /> While your interpretation seems to be correct, I have doubts regarding the applicability to officers who were not Capt as on 01 Jan 1986. As brought out that the the IV CPC fixed the Basic Pay by first calculating the total emoluments and then culling the Rank pay out while the civilian counterparts were fixed the BP at the total emoluments thus in effect providing them also a Rank Pay and that too merged with BP. This has not just resulted in the Capt to Brigs being denied their due but also altered their parity vis-a'-vis their civilian counterparts. Now comes the questions:-<br /> (a)Were only the officers who were Capt to Brig as on 01 Jan 1986 brought down in parity or all future officers also affected? If so, then shouldn't the parity of all future officres be restored or should they become junior to their civilian counterparts because the IV CPC made a mistake which is corrected only for some officers.<br />(b) While only the Capt to Brigs <br />of 01 Jan 86 get the correct BP, all future AF officers are fixed lower/given lesser amount. At the same time, wouldn't all of 01 Jan 86 and future Civilian officers have been given in effect RP in BP and thus will draw more BP.<br /> (c) Wouldn't SC order result in changing the fixation formula of BP by IV CPC for AF officers. If so, then why should it be applicable to some officers and not to all future officers? <br />(c) Is this fight for money or for Izzat/ parity. If for parity, then shouldn't the SC order be applicable for all officers irrrespective of whether they were Capt or not as on 01 Jan 86 especially as it was caused by erroneous Pay fixation . If not corrected, the civilian counterparts would have won the issue in the long run despite the SC order. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-6586532043094400712012-10-02T11:21:01.147+05:302012-10-02T11:21:01.147+05:30@Col Raju,October 2, 2012 3:27 AM Sir what about t...@Col Raju,October 2, 2012 3:27 AM Sir what about the increments due to bunching? <br /><br />Quote from SAI "(iii) For officers drawing pay from the 13th upto the 16th stage in the existing<br />scale, if there is bunching beyond the 12th stage - by three increments."Unquote.manu69https://www.blogger.com/profile/10803426273057923759noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-63563722931656045862012-10-02T03:27:53.601+05:302012-10-02T03:27:53.601+05:30Dear All,
Please understand one thing. This entir...Dear All,<br /><br />Please understand one thing. This entire case is of wrong fixation of pay as on 01 Jan 1986 and 01 Jan 1996 as the amount equal to rank pay of the officers holding the rank of Capt to Brig as on these two days was deducted from the revised emoluments and then the basic pay was fixed. Every body from Capt to Brig has got the rank pay during IV and V CPC but the amount deducted while fixation of the revised pay in both the pay commissions on 01 Jan 86 and 01 Jan 1996 was wrong and such deductions with DA over it announced from time to time are the arrears for those officers who were holding the rank between Capt and Brig on 01 Jan 86 and 01 Jan 1996. These affected officers even after further promitions will keep getting the initially deducted amount in both the pay commissions ie arrears of IV CPC from 01 Jan 86 to 31 Dec 95 and Vth CPC from 01 Jan 96 to Dec 2005 with 6% interest from 01 Jan 2006. No other officers including those who get the rank of Capt after 01 Jan 86 and after 01 Jan 96 will get any arrears as no amount equivalent to rank pay was deducted while fixation of pay as those officers were not holding the rank of Capt hence not entitled for rank pay. An amount equal to rank pay for the rank held by the officers at the time of fixation of the revised pay which was debited is the amount of arrears.<br /><br />I will quote example of my own case. I was commissioned on 20 Jul 84, got Capt rank on 20 Jan 88. I was not holding capt rank on 01 Jan 86 hence no amount equal to rank pay was debited while fixation of my revised pay as Lt on 01 Jan 1986.<br />In Vth CPC on 01 Jan 1996 I was capt. as on 01 Jan 1996 my basic pay was Rs 3600, unrevised rank pay Rs 200, DA Rs 5180 (148% on 3500 slab),Ir I Rs 100 and IR II Rs 380, 40% of basic was 1520. The total pay of all these was Rs 10980. Out of this 10980, the CDA has deducted revised rank pay of Rs 400. The balance was Rs 10580. My basic was then fixed as Rs 10800, and they gave revised rank pay of Rs 400, total revised pay was Rs 11200. At the stage of the total amount of Rs 10980 the CDA should not have deducted revised rank pay but they should have straightway fixed my basic pay as Rs 11100 in the pay scale of capt 9600-300-11400. This way my total revised pay with rank pay should have been Rs 11500 and not Rs 11200 which they gave me on 01 Jan 1996. The deduction was Rs 300/- per month and DA there on till Dec 2005.<br /><br />Hope you all have understood now.<br /><br />But the case does not end here. I was getting unrevised rank pay of Rs 200 and DA 170% theron (Rs 340) the total rank pay which I got immediately before fixation of revised pay in Jan 1998 was Rs 540/-. The revised rank pay of Rs 400 given in Vth CPC was much less than what I got unrevised captain's rank pay with DA prior to V CPC. in V CPC the rank pay should have been fixed Rs 600 and not 400 as the successive pay commission does not reduce the pay but increases the pay. If my rank pay is now fixed to Rs 600/- with effect from 01 Jan 1996, then the arrears will be Rs 500/- a month with DA for next 10 years. My further promotions to Col wont effect on initial arrears.<br /><br />This is the story of the wrong fixation of revised pay on 01 Jan 86 and 01 Jan 96.<br /><br />Col RajuAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-73088076527934273842012-10-01T14:47:08.787+05:302012-10-01T14:47:08.787+05:30As per the gist of the whole case of rank pay, the...As per the gist of the whole case of rank pay, the observation by the courts was when the pay was fixed in IVth CPC on 01 Jan 1986 and in Vth CPC on 01 Jan 1996, the rank pay was first deducted and the revised pay was fixed and then the rank pay granted was shown separately. This was the anomaly. The pay should have been fixed without deducting the rank pay on 01 Jan 1986 and on 01 Jan 1996 to bring us at par with civilian counter parts pay. By deducting rank pay and then fixing pay then granting rank pay made us at par with our civilian counter parts which automatically granted the rank pay to civilian counter parts too. This was the big anomaly. The pay should have been first fixed with out deducting the rank pay which was not done. Thus the entire episode says that the pay of officers holding the rank of Capt to Brig on 01 Jan 1986 and 01 Jan 1996 was wrongly fixed. I was Lt on 01 Jan 1986, no rank pay was deducted while fixation of my pay on 01 Jan 1986 as I was not holding the rank of Capt and above hence hence am not eligible for rank pay from 01 Jan 1986 as nothing was deducted while my pay fixation. But I was promoted to the rank of Capt in Jan 1988 and I started getting rank pay of Rs 200/- per month from Jan 1986 onwards. When an officer gets promotion, he gets the rank pay in addition to the pay being given to him but his entire pay does not need to be re-fixed on such promotion. Hope now it is clear as regards applicability of fixation of rank pay on 01 Jan 1986. Lts wont get rank pay. <br /><br />Now the second issue is fixation of pay in Vth pay commission wef 01 Jan 1996.<br /><br />I was already Captain prior to 01 Jan 1996. As per the pay fixation sheet which I have got along with my pay slip for the month of Jan 1998, my total pay (unrevised) as on 01 Jan 1996 including basic 3600, rank pay 200, DA 5180 (148% max DA on 3500) IR I 100, IR II 380 plus 40% of basic (3600+200) Rs 1520 worked out to Rs 10980/-, CDA (O) has deducted Rs 400 saying "Less revised rank pay" and the revised pay came to Rs 10580, then may pay was fixed at Rs 10800/-(in the pay scale of 9600-300-11400). Here the CDA(O) has faulted by deducting the revised rank pay of Rs 400/- before fixation of revised pay. Had the revised rank pay of Rs 400/- not deducted, my pay works out to Rs 10980/- (see above) and the revised pay should have been fixed at Rs 11100/- (in the pay scale of Rs 9600-300-11400) and not 10800 as fixed by the CDA (O). Thus the deficit amount in my pay fixation from 01 Jan 1996 was Rs 300/- pm which I am entitled every month plus DA as increased from time to time till 31 Dec 2005. This is what the effect.<br /><br />No come Third issue.<br /><br />I was getting rank pay in IVth CPC Rs 200 plus DA 148% till 01 Jan 1996 making total rank pay Rs 496/- per month till 31 Dec 2005 and later I kept on getting rank pay of Rs 200 + DA Rs 340/- pm at 170% announced in year 1997 till 31 Dec 1997 till before getting the Vth CPC arrears in Jan 1998. This follows that the last rank pay in unrevised pay scale was Rs 540/- including DA. Granting of rank pay of captain for Rs 400/- in Vth CPC wef 01 Jan 1996 was incorrect as the rank pay including DA was Rs 540/- and this can not be brought down to Rs 400/- in successive pay commission. The Capt's rank pay from 01 Jan 1996 should have been fixed at Rs 600/- (Next step to Rs 540/-). This issue need to be taken up by all of us with CDA (O) Pune.<br /><br />The flash news appearing on the PCDA(O) web site is wrong. As per this flash news they are calling for the relevant information from the officers who were holding the rank of Capt and above upto Brig as on 01 Jan 1986. The mistake which was done in IVth CPC pay fixation was again repeated in Vth CPC pay fixation also.<br /><br />Hope the Rank Pay case is clear now. But let us wait and see what more mistakes the CDA commits.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-16969072012979478802012-09-29T23:14:49.818+05:302012-09-29T23:14:49.818+05:30Has anyone got the right interpretation to the &qu...Has anyone got the right interpretation to the "Flash News" on the PCDA(O) site? Is it line with the orders of the Supreme Court? Maj Navdeep can you enlighten us please!<br />RegardsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-66117280035618766552012-09-28T22:32:07.495+05:302012-09-28T22:32:07.495+05:30eexsentiaAll the defense officers; especially, the...eexsentiaAll the defense officers; especially, the entire retired defense offices, are extremely grateful to the judiciary mainly the Supreme Court of the Great Nation and High Court of Kerala. The judiciary at no level succumbs to any pressure of the State/Central Govt.<br />We all defense personnel are most grateful to judiciary for their prudence and rightly appreciating the genuineness of the case, in spite of repeatedly filing the petitions by min of def and the Central Govt. the whole nation knows that it is the judiciary alone, which can preserve the rights of the country men and guarantee the rule of law! The verdict definitely goes a long way, in reaffirming the strength and independence of judiciary! <br />Further, we all the defense officers; especially, the entire retired defense offices, are extremely grateful and thankful to Maj A K Dhanpalan; who alone appreciated the case of pay fixation to include the rank pay as the CDA (O) had left it out. This officer had the courage to fight for the righteousness of the case, spent a huge amount single handedly, and fought until won the case. It shows, how much the defence officers know and take care for their own rights. In fact whatever is decided/given by the Govt./and or CDA (O)/PAOs, we blindly accept the same. Well done Maj A K dhanpalan for your courage and rightly appreciating case.<br />I would fail in my duties unless I whole heartedly convey my special thanks to the Retired Defence Officers’ Association (RDOA) who fought the case to the tooth and nail with their amazing strength, stamina and commitment until, finally won the case for the cause of many of the serving and all the retired officers.<br /> I have no hesitation in mentioning that the Min of Def is also meant to take care of welfare of the defense personnel, but most of the time they oppose the rightful causes of the defense forces personnel, may that be related to pay commissions anomalies, OROP case or rank pay case as has been seen in the past. I wish they wake up and if do not support, at least they must not always oppose. In fact the politicians never do anything on their own and completely guided/dictated by the IAS lobby. This reflects cluelessness of the politicians of our Great Nation.<br />I am disgusted to say that defense forces senior officers, who are especially dictated by the Chiefs, Lt. Gen, and equivalent of the forces who utterly failed in supporting the righteousness of the case of rank pay and failed to support it. Even they never took up the case of OROP seriously, which seems to be because they are not affected by the OROP as they get their fixed pay. <br />And what a JAG branch of the defense forces who miserably failed to appreciate the case, where as a junior officer of the rank of just a major fought it alone and won the case of rank pay; whereas the JAG Br. failed even to support it. I wish such a part of defense forces be disbanded, rather than spending such a huge exchequer for their maintenance for nothing.<br />We all know that the IESM has been fighting for the OROP case for a very long time. All the major political parties of the country have been repeatedly promising and even incorporating in their agenda of granting OROP, but always dismayed the veterans. However, this is the first time, presumably, it is all due to Hon Prime Minister and Mrs. Sonia Gandhi who appreciated the cause and carried their way and granted the OROP, though negligible which is the portion of OROP case projected. I hope some time wisdom will prevail and some Govt. may grant the OROP as is being projected by the IESM. Well-done IESM, and keep on putting your best efforts until desired results are achieved.<br />However, nothing is sure unless notification is published by the Govt. and we have to wait and watch till it is published.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08242811914492083620noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-91630438628047099112012-09-28T18:58:35.391+05:302012-09-28T18:58:35.391+05:30A query at the Technical Section of PCDAO, Pune re...A query at the Technical Section of PCDAO, Pune reveals that ONLY officers who were in service on 01/01/86 will get the benefit.<br /><br />Officers commissioned after that date WILL NOT get any benefit.<br /><br />Any comments / clarfications / interpretations by Maj Navdeep / any other offr ?<br /><br />RegardsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-89955217917590326852012-09-27T20:20:21.231+05:302012-09-27T20:20:21.231+05:30UOI ACHIEVED ITS AIM THROUGH I.A. 9 FILED TO RECAL...UOI ACHIEVED ITS AIM THROUGH I.A. 9 FILED TO RECALL THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT ORDER OF 08 MARCH 2010 as brought out by col raju. SEE HOW?<br /><br />Judgment of 08 Mar 2010 spells out interest to be paid from 01 Jan 1986 on rank pay arrears.<br /><br />UOI files I.A. 9 to recall the Orders of 08 Mar 2010<br /><br />Judgment of 04 Sep 2012 relaxes the burden of interest which will now be paid from 01 Jan 2006.<br /><br />What the MOD gained and what the veterans and serving officers lost?<br /><br />See the table below;<br /><br />The total interest from 1986 to Dec 2012 on the total rank pay from Jan 1986 to Dec 1995 is 144.25% (If you don’t believe ask me will send the excel sheet)<br /><br />The total interest from 01 Jan 2006 to Dec 2012 on total rank pay from Jan 1986 to Dec 1995 is 42%<br /><br />As per UOI and SG the total burden to exchequer is Rs 1600 crore calculated prior to filing I.A. 9 based on Honourable Supreme Court Order of 08 Mar 2010.<br /><br />Rs 1600 Crore calculated by MOD includes interest at 144.25%. The interest is 944.93 Crore & the total rank pay for 20000 officers is Rs 655.07 Crore<br /><br />After the Honourable Supreme Court judgment on 04 Sep 2012 the interest rate came down to 42% only. The rank pay of Rs 655.07 crore accrues interest of Rs 275.13 Crore at 42%. The total burden on the exchequer now is Rs 930.20 Crore. (ie 655.07 Crore + 275.13 Crore)<br /><br />What is achieved by UOI is that the MOD saved Rs 669.80 Crore (Rs 1600 Crore – Rs 930.20 Crore). This total saving is on interest (Rs 944.93 Crore – 275.13 Crore = Rs 669.80 Crore.)<br /><br />Good, three cheers to UOI for saving Rs 669.80 Crore. But the UOI & MOD should look back and realise as to at whose cost they made this saving, for whose benefit they made this saving, from whose services they made this saving, at whose faults the exchequer today got burdened, at whose mistakes and faults the burden came on exchequer today, why not those who caused this burden to the exchequer today contribute the burden as penalty for their mistakes and failures. Any answers? <br /><br />Finally the looser are honest armed forces officers who never take the route the way the country’s civilian crowed takes by agitations, rasta rokos, strikes, destruction and so many. <br /><br />We waited for 26 years, finally some thing came. But how can this fruit reaches those who are no more now. Will the UOI & MOD understand this loss?<br /><br />jdosvdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05336137186476031344noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-46306670186607849522012-09-26T16:31:12.285+05:302012-09-26T16:31:12.285+05:30Is there any change in the present basic pay of Of...Is there any change in the present basic pay of Officers? Are they now at par with their IAS/IPS counter part?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05037445088303069298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-3426910400072688682012-09-10T11:11:55.040+05:302012-09-10T11:11:55.040+05:30A well done job by RDOA and i am sure in future al...A well done job by RDOA and i am sure in future also if required the fight will be fought till end. Lot of calculations are being made by every one for arrears but i suggest that some group is created to calculate so that we are not cheated by these Babus again. Thanks Maj Navdeep for keeping us all informed<br /><br />Col (Retd) A K SehgalAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-8968152090886773072012-09-08T20:31:35.699+05:302012-09-08T20:31:35.699+05:30This indeed is a heartening and good news for all ...This indeed is a heartening and good news for all brother offrs.....we should be highly thankful to Maj Dhanapalan and RDOA for their commendable effort....In my personal view, the entire fraternity owes them. AS a small token of respect and motivation for them to fight our endless other battles with bureaucrats to restore dignity of Armed Forces, we should come forward and at least present Rs 1000 or more , each, to both of them. With 20,000 officers benefiting from this, the total amount generated will surely help the organisation to continue fighting for our other battles. REgards.. PSMPSMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17624501523128418866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-39179574591739360842012-09-08T15:42:10.927+05:302012-09-08T15:42:10.927+05:30Here is a link to the judgement.Here is a link to the <a href="https://twitter.com/dhoop_a/status/244374421962358784" rel="nofollow">judgement</a>.Dhoophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17461434428038701574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-26478793439870847332012-09-08T12:22:27.267+05:302012-09-08T12:22:27.267+05:30@Col Pardaman Singh:"..NHQ has forwarded..&qu...@Col Pardaman Singh:<i>"..NHQ has forwarded.."</i>; Was the email received directly by you from "NHQ"? Do please share with us if you have the link to the webpage on which that 'calculation' is displayed.<br /><br />I think it's best to wait till RDOA, Maj Navdeep clarify exactly what the status is as I've attempted to highlight <a href="http://sol-dozdoz.blogspot.in/2012/09/the-arrears-calculation-frenzy.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.slhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01783279172831388828noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-44045695011371000192012-09-08T12:07:16.389+05:302012-09-08T12:07:16.389+05:30All can improve their MATHS. while calculating the...All can improve their MATHS. while calculating their dues, good time pass....<br /><br /><br />SATISFIED SOLDIERAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-85118850801405289552012-09-07T22:23:39.576+05:302012-09-07T22:23:39.576+05:30NHQ has forwarded e mail on effect of supreme cour...NHQ has forwarded e mail on effect of supreme court judgement with examples.Calculations are more or less correct. Those who are calculating arrears up to Rs 8 Lac are grossly out.Beside Pay, it will effect retirement benefits,subsequent Pay scales in 5th & 6th pay commissions.Status will also be restored.<br />Some minor errors in the examples in the post are as under.<br />(a) Example 2 (Lt Cdr 11 years service)<br />Sl 6 :-Pay after court order should be Rs 4350 as Rs 4300 does not exist in the integrated pay scale. SO the diff will be<br />Rs 350.<br />(b) Example 3 (Lt Cdr 16 years ser) Total 4+5 is incorrect.<br />(c) Example 4(CDR TS 21 Yrs Ser)<br />Sl 6 :-Pay fixed by Govt should be Rs 4317-600=3717 ie 3800 +600.<br />Sl 8:- 4950-4400=550<br />(d) Example 5 Capt(20 Yrs Ser) <br />Sl 7 :- Pay after Court order Rs 4800+1000<br />= 5800<br />Sl 8 :- Diff 5800-5500=300Col Pardaman Singhnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-1640011270832942672012-09-07T18:48:08.357+05:302012-09-07T18:48:08.357+05:30Congratulations to one and all!!!
given below is t...Congratulations to one and all!!!<br />given below is the link to RDOA...Please do contribute..<br />http://rdoaindia.blogspot.in/2012/07/additional-contrbution-of-rs-1000.html<br />@IndianACE... Great suggestion... Why just name the roads... New constuctions, auditoriums, stadiums, ranges and so on could also be named. Even Officers' Messes should honour Maj AK Dhanapalan in a befitting manner.<br />Maj Navdeep ... I salute you for your untiring efforts in keeping the officer cadre posted on various issues.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-74590184164617460892012-09-07T18:06:00.038+05:302012-09-07T18:06:00.038+05:30Dear Maj. Navdeep
Thanks a million.
You have been ...Dear Maj. Navdeep<br />Thanks a million.<br />You have been very kind in posting the latest relating to the Three Services, all along.<br />I request you please enlighten on the following related issues:<br /><br />Will the DA admissible on the hike of pay/pension also be admissible?<br /><br />Is this 6% Interest for 7 years now, going to be simple or Compounded “Monthly / Quarterly ? Half Yearly/ Annually” ??<br /><br />Best Regard<br />Col MC Joshi (retired)<br />NOIDA<br />TeGrolJohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00362739249015578926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-36397581591938925782012-09-07T17:05:27.757+05:302012-09-07T17:05:27.757+05:30Dear Armymen,
Now you know where to go for your ri...Dear Armymen,<br />Now you know where to go for your rights. The government and the civil administration is all out to undermine the Armed Forces. Should no action be taken against those civil servants who ill advised the successive governments over 25 years.? What about those who died without getting their rightful dues? If pay fixation was wrong as in 1986, then why the interest only with effect from 2006? How has the wrong pay fixation in 1986 affected the subsequent pay fixations in V & VI CPC? What about other arrears deprived on account allowances granted on the basis of lower pay scale? Was it only about the arrears, what about the agony that all have undergone over these years?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com