tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post2718629071412047927..comments2024-02-08T22:01:40.101+05:30Comments on Indian Military : Service Benefits and Issues: Biggest news of 2016 for Central Government pensionersNavdeep / Maj Navdeep Singhhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11481215977936848477noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-38689449656394187512016-08-31T12:40:56.311+05:302016-08-31T12:40:56.311+05:30Navdeep sir,namaskar Iam from haryana. I want to m...Navdeep sir,namaskar Iam from haryana. I want to meet you. May i have your address please or can you give your contect no.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11065524660821763437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-3702576371362498882016-08-01T00:28:56.687+05:302016-08-01T00:28:56.687+05:30What is the present position on delinking 33 years...What is the present position on delinking 33 years service rule for Armed forces personnel. CDA(P) was prompt in issuing Circular 148 for defence civilians in Apr 2016 whereas they are silent on uniformed personnel. Who is the agency delaying issue of notification ?ILAPURhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07015817040276968901noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-32722812595505585752016-07-28T16:29:29.463+05:302016-07-28T16:29:29.463+05:30 Circular regarding de-linking of 33 years service... Circular regarding de-linking of 33 years service rule was issued to civilians during April 2016. Even after lapse of three months no circular is issued in respect of ex-servicemen. Why this discrimination.?<br />?<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06842045246492535609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-59920676248613267382016-07-11T16:17:55.150+05:302016-07-11T16:17:55.150+05:30Sir, Despite all the time that may have been neede...Sir, Despite all the time that may have been needed by DESW/PCDA/CGDA to work out the details to issue the notification do you still feel the delay is not intentional and can MOD Babus still play some games to delay the matter????Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17625481885833185836noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-36388764883005194202016-05-12T00:16:56.681+05:302016-05-12T00:16:56.681+05:30I retired on 01 Jan 2005. Does it mean that I shal...I retired on 01 Jan 2005. Does it mean that I shall be able to draw arrears of diff of pay between the scaled/weighted rates vs full pension. Will there be recalculation of gratuity and other applicable amounts?Najmul Ahasannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-81412250700275609932016-05-11T22:29:56.877+05:302016-05-11T22:29:56.877+05:30Where as arrears of revised pension have been paid...Where as arrears of revised pension have been paid from 1.1.06, arrears of revised Diability Pension have still not been paid.By Who and when will this come about.Jps Shergillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07379887022203076948noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-89378630870874841162016-05-11T21:53:49.133+05:302016-05-11T21:53:49.133+05:30Thks maj Navdeep
Keep it up God bless you
What abo...Thks maj Navdeep<br />Keep it up God bless you<br />What about disability pension wef 1 1 2016<br />Thks rgdscolonel sahibhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09821682309304944361noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-11000513370161839142016-05-06T12:43:23.899+05:302016-05-06T12:43:23.899+05:30This amendment to Ministry of Personnel, PG & ...This amendment to Ministry of Personnel, PG & Pensions Department of Pension & Pensioners' Welfare Resolution No. 38/37/08-P&PW(A) dated 06 Apr 2016 and associated PCDA circular C-149 may not be applicable to Armed Forces personnel; an amendment to MoD, Dept of Ex-servicemen Welfare, letter No. 17(4)/2008(1)/D(Pen/Policy) Dated 11th November 2008 (and associated PCDA Circular 397 )may be called for. Thus PCDA or banks may not be acting on this amendment to provide arrears. Can you please check an advise. Thanks and regards.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03990321802453528484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-60927604417211108412016-05-04T12:42:42.485+05:302016-05-04T12:42:42.485+05:30Sir,on removal of 33 years clause, what will be th...Sir,on removal of 33 years clause, what will be the pension of Nb sub gp Y with 21.5 years serviceAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06842045246492535609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-21551685803454334882016-04-27T12:03:40.993+05:302016-04-27T12:03:40.993+05:30Dear Major,
Thanks for the clarifications.
A perus...Dear Major,<br />Thanks for the clarifications.<br />A perusal of Circular issued by PCDA(P) (circular C-149 dated 08 Apr 2016) seems to apply only for Civilians paid from Defence Estimates and not for the regular Armed forces (Army/Navy/AF).<br />Would it be possible for you to reexmaine the issue and comment on it.<br />Thanks and regards<br />Lt Col K Kamesh (Retd) Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03990321802453528484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-64037722984074354812016-04-26T18:14:24.335+05:302016-04-26T18:14:24.335+05:30Similar orders should now be issued for defence pe...Similar orders should now be issued for defence pensioners also by the Ministry of Defence. <br />Has it happened?<br />vinod matkarvrumatshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01572571727000085851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-29974716621800559062016-04-23T14:35:27.755+05:302016-04-23T14:35:27.755+05:301. Sir, I am RC Officer and served in Ranks for 19...1. Sir, I am RC Officer and served in Ranks for 19 years and 2 months, and 12 years as an officer and retired as substantive Major on 31 Dec 2003. Total QS 31 years and two months.As per Para 11 of Circular 555 on OROP , Maj with 21 years are entitled pension of lt col. some bank have credited the pension of lt col.circular 557 is also not very clear on this matter.may I know the confirm direction on this matter , whether Majors with 21 Years QS will get pension of lt Col.<br /><br />2. some cases have been filed in AFT/ High Courts for promotion of retired Majors to rank of Lt Col with some cut of date as per AVSC committee. may I know the legal implications of these cases and likely chances of winning these cases. In case somebody is promoted after retirement he will get all his dues from back date. It is also learnt that this promotion if applicable, will be only for officers retired after AVSC report . How it is not applicable for those retired in same rank with same length of service from same army.pl clarify. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09637693144053151991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-13716772479217588162016-04-20T11:37:34.736+05:302016-04-20T11:37:34.736+05:30Sir, As per the Circular 547 all pre-2006 Armed Fo...Sir, As per the Circular 547 all pre-2006 Armed Forces pensioners/family pensioners determine in terms of fitment formula laid down in Para 4.1 of above said letter dated 11.11.2008, shall in no case be lower than fifty percent and thirty percent respectively, of the minimum of the pay in pay band plus the Grade pay corresponding to the pre revised scale from which the pensioner had retired/discharged including Military Service Pay and ‘X’ Group Pay where applicable. Wheres. the following anomalies are not removed:<br />1. Tables were issued in contrary reducing the minimum pension prorata so arrived. <br />2. They have failed to stick on to the corresponding scales of post 2006 with that of pre-revised.<br />3.Group 'Z' has been merged with 'Y' in post 2006 but the table still shows Group'Z'.<br />4.In Air force table again they have differentiated 'Sgt X Group' and 'Sgt X (Dip)' whereas, there is such differentiation in post 2006 scales.<br />5. The minimum pension of each rank should be not be less than 50% of minimum of scale of rank but, they have given different 'minimum pensions' for every increase of 6 months service in each rank, which is contrary to the principle shown above.<br /><br /> Why the MOD officials are bent upon doing injustice to the lower ranks every time. Are they going to at least remove the anomalies now in the order to be issued in tune with DOPT order removing prorata reduction in minimum pension. It is understood that that the mod has already issued orders to PCDA in this regard and PCDA is likely to issue order within a week. P.Vigneshwar Rajuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02670571658633663482noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-15917807639367683602016-04-17T19:09:30.442+05:302016-04-17T19:09:30.442+05:30I FEEL THE ORDERS ON DELINKING OF 33 YEARS FOR FUL...I FEEL THE ORDERS ON DELINKING OF 33 YEARS FOR FULL PENSION APPEARS TO HAVE SOME SCOPE FOR (MIS)APPLICATION / IN SOME DEVIOUS MANNERS. IN BRIEF IT ORDERS FULL PENSION ISNSTEAD OF PRO-RATED PENSION DRAWN BY THE PENSIONER "AT THE TIME OF RETIREMENT".....WHAT TYPE OF RETIREMENT? NORMAL/ VALUNTARY/ DISABLED- MEDICAL/ COMPULSORY RETIREMENT / ON TECH RESIGNATION TO JOIN PSUs AS ABSORBEES?...WILL NORMAL SUPERANNUATION RETIREES BE THE SCAPEGOAT , FOR NOT HAVING RETIRED FEW OR UP TO 5 YEARS EARLIER TO GET ALL BENEFITS INCLUDING ONE-TIME RETIREMENT BENEFITS, ENJOY AGAIN FULL PENSION WITHOUT RECOVERIES?......V NATARAJANAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00150803602765844273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-67878474338736523702016-04-12T12:48:44.650+05:302016-04-12T12:48:44.650+05:30AS PER OROP NOTIFICATION REVISION EVERY FIVE YEARS...AS PER OROP NOTIFICATION REVISION EVERY FIVE YEARS .<br />i.e NEXT REVISION FOR PENSIONERS 2019 ?<br />will there be 7 th pay commission revision for EXSM ?<br />@ COL Sudarshan SURI. <br />IT will be unending demands.<br />7 th pay commission has recommended gratuity subject to a maximum of Rs 20 lakhs.<br />Gratuity RULES - at the rate of 1/2 month pay(inclusive of DA) FOR EACH COMPLETED year of service<br />subject to a maximum of 16 1/2 times.( 33 years of service)<br />5TH PAY COMMISSION RS 3.2 LAKHS - MAXIMUM<br />6TH PAY COMMISSION Rs 10 lakhs maximum.<br />BAD LUCK FOR SOME GOOD LUCK FOR SOME<br /><br />COL.AKREDDYnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-4802001334096140052016-04-11T13:54:37.335+05:302016-04-11T13:54:37.335+05:30Perhaps we must thank profusely those who relentle...Perhaps we must thank profusely those who relentlessly pursued the cases of anomalies and injustices and got favorable judgments from the courts, fact that justice is prevailing despite odds is a hope for better future,perhaps the MOD takes cognizance of futile litigation and becomes reasonable enough for early settlement of anomalies. Maj Navdeep deserves to be congratulated for pursuance and showing empathy towards personnel of armed forces, though a silent educated illiterate, I do feel servicemen & ex-servicemen are willful ignorant of their rights and in the name of obedience, perhaps show timidity ! madhukarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01440886499656190086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-70060508210930376052016-04-10T19:58:52.216+05:302016-04-10T19:58:52.216+05:30Thank you sir for this good news.
Thank you sir for this good news. <br />madhunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-36769403838569707032016-04-10T12:31:29.471+05:302016-04-10T12:31:29.471+05:30Will not this judgement again leave room for alter...Will not this judgement again leave room for alteration of pension for a single rank wrt orop n de-linking of 33 yrs of service 4full pension one is contradictory 2 d other?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16719159291725447767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-29644664316517601472016-04-09T15:25:51.334+05:302016-04-09T15:25:51.334+05:30It means that all Pre - 2006 retirees will get the...It means that all Pre - 2006 retirees will get the same pension irrespective of the Qualifying Service (QS) they had rendered upto the time the OROP scheme got implemented. <br />The full Pension for various Ranks of Pre-2006 Vintage under 6 CPC pd ( PCDA (P) Circular Number 500) is as under :-<br /><br />Rank 2 Lt/Lt Capt Major Lt Col (TS) Lt Col(S) Colonel Brig Maj Lt Gen<br /> Gen <br />FULL 15465 16145 18205 26265 26265 27795 29145 30350 36500<br /> Biggest beneficiary are the PMR Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04902331340369303300noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-37332624137581383692016-04-09T10:23:27.511+05:302016-04-09T10:23:27.511+05:30Pradeep Ji your Concepts of MOD DIKATs are rightly...Pradeep Ji your Concepts of MOD DIKATs are rightly established & logical. HSC & AFT verdicts justify your statement.<br />Time they amend their approach.AKShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07802311086597618874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-6081163001414343132016-04-09T09:15:35.156+05:302016-04-09T09:15:35.156+05:30Just curious. Why should PCDA (P) issue any circul...Just curious. Why should PCDA (P) issue any circular if this does not apply to OROP and if all are now on equal pension post 2014?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16599233400842278493noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-69963666681333971362016-04-09T08:15:06.045+05:302016-04-09T08:15:06.045+05:30Ex JWO MS Krishna Moorthy
Sir,
It is better late ...Ex JWO MS Krishna Moorthy<br /><br />Sir,<br />It is better late than never. The Govt must have done this at the first instant itself when it was recommended by 6th CPC, instead they did not make it for Pre 2006 and kept two categories of pensioners, Pre 2006 and Post 2006 and they were dilly dallying with notional maximum etc., Lot of court cases must have been avoided. Even before some months, the govt did not open their eyes if it so PCDA circular 547 should not have come instead this OM should have been out in that time. Anyway, still the good sense prevailed. Major Sir, I do not know that you also may be sometime a reason for releasing the OM because you are a member in the advisory committee to the Govt to avoid further litigation. Thank You.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15961934495423982635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-61577608553678553962016-04-09T07:22:45.925+05:302016-04-09T07:22:45.925+05:30Respected Nav Deep ji, 50 percent pension order, w...Respected Nav Deep ji, 50 percent pension order, what will be the basic pension of Nb Sub Gp 'Y' 21.5 years service.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06842045246492535609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-90632525803603240202016-04-08T23:38:30.756+05:302016-04-08T23:38:30.756+05:30Sub RK Menon. I will help you in getting arrears f...Sub RK Menon. I will help you in getting arrears from 01.01.2006 to 30 Jun 2009. Please email your service & personal details on my email majornsgill3025@gmail.com and contact me on 09876188868.Thanks Major NS Gill ex SROMAJOR NAZAR SINGH GILLhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15514374408062168924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1503293844377013031.post-38809145655635124722016-04-08T21:43:19.354+05:302016-04-08T21:43:19.354+05:30SIR,
I AM A SUBEDAR RETIRED ON 31-12-93 AS CA...SIR,<br /> I AM A SUBEDAR RETIRED ON 31-12-93 AS CAT "B".COMPULSORY RETIREMENT WITH OUT ANY DISABILITY PENSION.AS PER CDA CiR 430 PENSION IS INCREASED FROM 01-07-09. (11120)NO ARREARS FROM 01-01-06 IS GIVEN.AS PER CIR 501 NO INCREASE IN BASIC PENSION SANCTIONED.AS CIR 555 PENSION INCREASED FROM 11120 TO 11615.AS PER CIR 547 BASIC PENSION AS ON 01-01-2006 INCRESED FROM 8603 TO 8723.iS THER NO PROVISION TO GET ARREARS FROM 01-01-06 TO 31-6-2009.WHAT IS THE EXPECTED PENSIO AS PER 7TH CPC.<br />SIR, PLEASE CLARIFY.<br /><br /> YOURS FAITH FULLY<br /> RK MENON<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02990303843514973486noreply@blogger.com